Hackers do what they do to make money. Thatâs why they create ransomware like Linkup and Cryptolocker, and thatâs why massive corporations like Microsoft pay bug bounties as large as $100,000 to anyone who can detect vulnerabilities in their software. Itâs also why the Mt.Gox Bitcoin exchange did what it did last Friday, February 7th.
Bitcoin Transaction Malleability
Mt.Gox is one of the largest Bitcoin exchange sites in operation today. At one point, they were the largest. Bitcoin trading is an extremely competitive field, however, where things change fast. Itâs also an industry notorious for growing pains, as many of the finer points of Bitcoin technology are still in flux.
One of these finer points is called Transaction Malleability, and itâs the reason Mt.Gox made the decision to freeze all withdrawals on February 7h, 2014. Essentially, each and every Bitcoin transaction is tracked using a unique hash; however, due to what Mt.Gox calls a âdesign issueâ in Bitcoin’s coding, this hash can be altered without invalidating a Bitcoinâs signature. Fraudsters are taking advantage of this âdesign issueâ to receive multiple payments from Mt.Gox from what should be just a single withdrawal.
Imagine going to the bank with a withdrawal slip and requesting $100 from your teller. You fill out the slip, your teller types the information into her computer, the computer processes the information, and moments later youâre handed a crisp $100 bill. Now, imagine that each time you do this, the computer assigns a Transaction ID to your withdrawal in the form of a random number, and that that ID is the only way to prove you just pulled out $100.
Imagine having the power to freeze time in this scenario. Imagine also that you can shrink down to the size of an electron and go into the tellerâs computer to change that Transaction ID. This is basically whatâs going on with Mt.Gox and transaction malleability. Since the computer has no record of your $100 withdrawal, and since the teller canât prove she just handed you $100, you can simply unfreeze time, point to your withdrawal slip, and say âHey, whereâs my $100?!â And, because that Transaction ID was the only way to prove that the bank had given you your money, theyâll have no choice but to admit fault and pay you out of their pocket.
Do this 100 times in a row, and youâve made $10,000.
Bitcoinâs Response to Mt.Gox
Fraudsters are taking advantage of Bitcoinâs transaction malleability by changing transaction tracking hashes before they are recorded. This has no effect on the withdrawalâs taking place, and it means that when the fraudster complains to Mt.Gox about not being paid, Mt.Gox has to pay them because thereâs no proof saying they already did. This transaction malleability hack works because the specific tracking hashes in question are the only way Mt.Gox keeps track of withdrawals and transactions.
Many among the Bitcoin community are branding this (over)reliance on a single and vulnerable tracking mechanism an epic mistake. Mt.Goxâs Feb. 7th withdrawal freeze press release caused at least a $160 dip in the value of Bitcoins and provoked response from Bitcoin founder, Greg Maxwell. Maxwell, and many others, point to the fact that the transaction malleability issue has been well known by just about everyone involved in Bitcoins since 2011, and that Mt.Goxâs freeze was an over reactive response to something they should be fixing on their own. Namely, there are other exchanges that use other ways to track transactions, limiting vulnerability to a transaction malleability hack.
The Death of Bitcoins
Beyond the issue of where to place the blame, the biggest question surrounding Mt.Goxâs decision to freeze withdrawals indefinitely is: Why? Why would a company that relies on the value of Bitcoins make a decision that they had to have known would negatively affect said value, and did? One answer is that theyâre losing a ton of money, and they panicked. Another is that that theyâre pulling for a power play.
Mt.Goxâs press release states that the transaction malleability issue âis not limited to Mt.Gox, and affects all transactions where Bitcoins are being sent to a third party.â It also states Mt.Gox believes âthat the changes required for addressing this issue will be positive over the long term for the whole [Bitcoin] community.â
The press release goes on to say that these changes would include âusing a different hash for transaction tracking purposes,â while continuing to include the old transaction tracking hashes in each Bitcoin block Merkle Tree. What this amounts to is essentially a new mode of encryption, which Mt.Gox would then standardize and implement in all future transactions. Being that Mt.Gox is one of the largest Bitcoin exchanges in the world, this new mode of encryption would send ripples throughout the Bitcoin community. Mt.Gox may very well be attempting to position itself as the solution to transaction malleability, even when other, smaller companies have dealt with the issue using multi-variable tracking methods, such as Bitcoin amount, timestamp, and address, for the last three years.
Traders are not happy about this. As Mt.Gox has yet to implement its new encryption standard and unfreeze withdrawals, it is difficult to say whether their solution is a legitimate improvement or simply a marketing stunt; but, for now, one thing is certain: Bitcoins are worth about half as much as they were just one year ago. Also important to consider is that the legal waters surrounding the cryptocurrency are murky at best — just Google Silk Road or Charlie Shrem if youâre interested — and that the majority of Internet users donât even know what they are. This latter characteristic rings true with most things computerized and is even reminiscent of the early days of World Wide Web itself. What remains clear is that computer security is a matter mostly financial, and that for the time being Bitcoins will play their part.
For more on this topic, check out Emsisoftâs Attack on Bitcoins.
UPDATE:
Shortly after publishing this article, the Bitcoin Foundation announced an ongoing DoS attack on various Bitcoin exchange sites. The attack is taking advantage of the transaction malleability issue by relaying mutated versions of transactions and thereby preventing transactions from confirming. In response, Slovenian-based Bitcoin exchange Bitstamp has frozen withdrawals, as was done by Mt.Gox.
Related Posts:
- Attack on Bitcoins: The virtual currency that is creating a…
- Trojan Spy Scam Email Campaign
- Malware Analysis: Ransomware âLinkupâ Blocks DNS and…
- Attaque sur Bitcoins : La monnaie virtuelle transforme les…
- Copycat Ransomware “Locker” Emerges
MtGox Freezes All Bitcoin Withdrawals
No comments:
Post a Comment